Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Healing the Sick’ Category

So you want to vaccinate your daughter against cervical cancer? Think again.

Posted in Healing the Sick, Jan 2010, tagged , on January 15, 2010| Leave a Comment »

Top researcher who worked on cervical cancer vaccine warns about its dangers

One of the key researchers involved in the clinical trials for both Gardasil and Cevarix cervical cancer vaccines has gone public with warnings about their safety and effectiveness. This highly unusual warning against these vaccines by one of Big Pharma’s own researchers surfaced in an exclusive interview with the Sunday Express in the UK over the last few days. There, Dr. Diane Harper openly admitted the vaccine doesn’t even prevent cervical cancer, stating, “[The vaccine] will not decrease cervical cancer rates at all.”

This is astonishing news. The whole push behind the cervical cancer vaccines is based on the belief that they prevent cervical cancer. That belief, it turns out, is a myth.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated since first being published. The Sunday Express story originally quoted here has been pulled. We suspect the intimidation of Dr. Harper to retract her statements may be a factor. Read full details in this updated report: http://www.naturalnews.com/027225_c…

Dr. Harper also warned that the cervical cancer vaccine was being “over-marketed” and that parents should be warned about the possible risk of severe side effects from the vaccine. She even concluded that the vaccine itself is more dangerous than the cervical cancer it claims to prevent!

Hysteria over genital warts?

In a New York Times article published last year, Dr. Harper spoke about the fear-based marketing of Gardasil by Merck:

“‘Merck lobbied every opinion leader, women’s group, medical society, politicians, and went directly to the people — it created a sense of panic that says you have to have this vaccine now…”

This behavior by drug companies — using fear tactics to promote a particular disease in order to sell the “treatment” — is called disease mongering. Most of the pharmaceutical profits generated today are based on precisely this tactic: Spread the fear, then sell the treatment. Read more about disease mongering here: http://www.naturalnews.com/disease_…

You can also toy around with the NaturalNews disease mongering engine, where you can invent your own diseases at the click of a button: http://www.naturalnews.com/disease-…

Why is disease mongering so important to the profits of the drug companies? They figured out many years ago that selling drugs only to those people who are sick was a very limited income opportunity. To rake in the real profits, they needed to devise a way to sell drugs to healthy people (i.e. people who don’t need them). That’s what cervical cancer vaccines really are: A scheme to sell vaccines to people who aren’t suffering from any disease at all.

That one of the industry’s own researchers is willing to speak out against this is not just highly unusual; it’s also highly courageous. It makes you wonder: Who, exactly, is this Dr. Harper?

Dr. Diane Harper

Dr. Harper is a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She studied additional courses at Stanford and received her medical degree from the University of Kansas. She was a key researcher in both Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, and she’s one of the most experienced researchers in the world on HPV-related diseases. She’s done work for both Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

Dr. Harper’s warnings about cervical cancer vaccines are especially relevant considering her expertise in the cost/benefit analysis of vaccines. Her conclusion is that cervical cancer vaccines aren’t worth the risks, nor are they worth all the effort being put into hyping them to the public. “This may not be the best use of our resources at this time,” she said in a Washington Post article.

So why do cervical cancer vaccines continue to be pushed by doctors and health authorities across the US, UK and other first-world nations? Because Big Pharma is the great corporate puppeteer that’s pulling the strings of legislators. With enough money and lobbyists, you can always overcome scientific thinking with fear-based marketing and under-the-table deal-making. Science-based medicine has no place in a world where disease is big business.

There’s a ridiculous amount of money to be made by pushing vaccines onto people who don’t need them. If I had ten bucks for every teenage girl that’s been injected with a cervical cancer vaccine, I’d be… well… GlaxoSmithKline.

Sources for this story include:

UMKC
http://www.med.umkc.edu/informatic_…

Dartmouth Medical School
http://dms.dartmouth.edu/faculty/fa…

Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy…

Daily Express (article no longer online)

See updated report on this story here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/027225_c…

Read Full Post »

Would You Invest in a Business with a 3% Success Rate?

Posted in December 2009, Healing the Sick, tagged , on December 21, 2009| 2 Comments »

“Chemo has a 97% fatality rate”…

The sad fact is that chemo is not only legal, but it is readily accepted by most oncologists as one of the best treatments for cancer. At least that’s what the typical oncologist tells the cancer patient….

…but in 1986, McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, one of the largest and most esteemed cancer treatment centers in the world, surveyed 64 oncologists to see how they would personally respond to a diagnosis of cancer.  The results will blow your mind. Are you sitting down? Of the 64 oncologists surveyed, 58 said that…

“ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members due to the fact that the drugs don’t work and are toxic!”

That  means that 91% of the oncologists surveyed would not submit themselves to the same protocols that they prescribe to their patients!  Is it just me, or does this seem hypocritical to you? I believe that this is not only hypocritical, but it borders on being criminal! They know that chemo will kill more patients than it will help, but they continue to tell their patients that it is their “best treatment option.” What a damnable lie!

Also read THIS.

Read Full Post »

Study verifies mammography screenings cause cancer

Posted in December 2009, Healing the Sick, tagged , on December 18, 2009| Leave a Comment »

A new study presented on December 1 at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) verified that annual mammography screenings may be responsible for causing breast cancer in women who are predisposed to the disease. Epidemiologist Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide from the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands suggests that doctors should be very cautious when screening younger women, especially those under age 30.

There are many conflicting reports about the benefits of mammography screenings, particularly among younger women below the age of 40. Because there is a high risk among women with genetic or familial predispositions to breast cancer when getting mammograms, Dr. Jansen-van der Weide and her research team are suggesting that these women get an alternative screening. Ultrasounds, MRIs, and heat thermography screenings are some alternatives that do not expose patients to radiation.

The study evaluated women in the high-risk group and determined that low-dose mammography radiation increased these women’s risk of developing breast cancer by 150 percent. Women under 20 who have had at least five mammograms are 2.5 times more likely to develop breast cancer than high-risk women who have never undergone low-dose mammography screenings.

Study authors emphasized the fact that doctors should be cautious in administering mammograms to younger women, especially those with a family history of breast cancer. Moderate- to low-risk women were not evaluated in the study. Alternative screening methods were encouraged in order to reduce the risk of women in high-risk groups from being harmed by radioactive exposure.

Comments

What this study really reveals is that there is no reason for any women to ever receive a mammogram ever again. Ultrasound and thermography should now be the new standard for breast cancer detection screenings, as they do not subject women to excess radiation.

This study also reveals that mammograms are really “repeat business machines” for the cancer industry. When enough women are subjected to mammography, a windfall of future cancer patients is absolutely assured, and this translates into billions of dollars in profits for the businesses invested in cancer: Big Pharma, mammogram machine manufacturers, and so on.

In fact, mammograms represent the slickest marketing gimmick we’ve ever seen in modern medicine. It’s a technology that recruits new patients by actually causing the disease is claims to “detect.” No wonder all the cancer industry non-profit groups donate so much money to breast cancer screening — it’s the best way to keep their sponsors in business!

Just take a look at the Susan Komen for the Cure non-profit, and you’ll see that a huge percentage of all the money they raise for “finding a cure” is really redirected to funding “free breast cancer screenings” that target poor women. The purpose of this whole scheme is to herd more women into extremely profitable (and extremely dangerous) cancer treatment cancers that generate billions for the cancer industry.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea…

Read Full Post »

Beta Glucan in the Fight Against Cancer

Posted in Healing the Sick, July 2009, tagged , on June 29, 2009| 3 Comments »

Beta-1,3-Glucan: Extraordinary Immune Support

By Michael LeVesque on March 19, 2009 10:11 AM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

Information provided by Immudyne, Inc.,
P.O. Box 51507, Palo Alto, CA

A new nutritional product called beta-1,3-glucan is one of the most exciting things happening today in the field of nutritional supplements.

Obtained from purified yeast, beta-1,3-glucan has a long scientific history and a reference list including literally hundreds of papers. Research originated in the 1940’s when Pillemer and his colleagues described a crude yeast cell wall preparation, Zymosan. They reported that this material was able to stimulate nonspecific immunity1. It was unknown at that time which element of this composition, containing a relatively crude mixture of proteins, lipids and polysaccharides, actually activated the immune response.

The answer came later in the 60’s, when Dr. Nicholas DiLuzio at Tulane University experimented with beta-1,3-glucan2 . In the late 1980’s Dr. Joyce Czop, at Harvard University, described the mode of action of this material in stimulating the immune system: there is a specific receptor for beta-1,3-glucan on the surface of certain cells, called macrophages3 that when activated, stimulate a cascade of events turning the body into “an arsenal of defense”.

Macrophages play an essential and pivotal role in the initiation and maintenance of the immune response. From an evolutionary point of view, the macrophage is the oldest and most consistently preserved immunologically competent cell known. Not only humans and higher animals, but primitive invertebrates such as Hydra, which have no other immunological effector cells, have macrophages. In order to function immunologically, the macrophages must pass through a state of activation which involves certain morphological changes but also, most importantly, a whole sequence of metabolic changes which result in the production of series of so-called cytokines which act as internal regulators of the immune system. Activation can be initiated by a variety of different stimuli, such as endotoxin, bacteria, viruses or chemicals which can be too toxic or pathogenic to be useful. Beta-1,3-glucan is not only orally effective, completely non-toxic and safe, but is one of the most potent stimulators of the immune response.

Considerable attention has been recently given to Aloe Vera extract, which was found to carry one of the macrophage activating polysaccharides, mannan or polymannose. While mannan has some macrophage activating potential, it is very slight compared to that of glucan4. There are several different glucans with different levels of activity, the most active of which is beta-1,3-glucan from the cell wall of yeast. A three dimensional model of this molecule shows it to be a helix, and the research at Harvard has shown that there exist, on the macrophage cell membrane, receptors for a small number of residues, approximately seven5 . The fact that such a small number of glucose units can activate this receptor is very remarkable. What is more remarkable still, is that there should be a specific receptor for this sort of polysaccharide chain on the surface of the most ancient sugar cell in the immune cascade. There is now evidence to show that glucan is, from an evolutionary point of view, the most widely and most commonly observed macrophage activator in nature6. The same enhancing mechanisms have been found in all branches of the animal, bird, fish and plant kingdoms7,8.

Full article here.

  • The best beta glucan is found here. And here’s the evidence. More evidence. How does the immune supplement you are taking now compare with beta glucan? (Be patient while file loads)

Who should take Beta Glucan and how much?

Everyone wanting to strengthen their immune system should take beta glucan (beta-1,3d glucan).

Transfer Point Beta GlucanThe average healthy person should take 200 mg of every day.

If you travel frequently you should take 500 mg per day.

If you are healthy and having surgery or dental work you should temporarily take 500 mg per day a week or two before and after your surgery.

Cancer patients should take 500 mg per 50 lbs. of body weight per day until they are in remission.

Read Full Post »

Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett killed by Big Pharma

Posted in Healing the Sick, July 2009, tagged , , on June 29, 2009| Leave a Comment »

(NaturalNews) That Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett both died in the last 48 hours is shocking news to many, but it’s not nearly as surprising as the fact that they were both killed by Big Pharma’s toxic drugs.

Michael Jackson, we now know, died from an injection of Demerol given by his doctor — a man who is now the subject of an LAPD manhunt. There is little question that the injection of Demerol — a potent pharmaceutical — caused Jackson’s death. Chalk it up to yet another tragic loss of a hugely inspiring artist who has become a victim of the pharmaceutical industry and overzealous medical doctors.

Demerol, by the way, is a highly-potent opioid drug that’s also highly addictive. And yet it’s being prescribed (and injected) by doctors with the full support of the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry and the conventional medical community. It is nothing less than amazing that mild drugs like marijuana remain outlawed while potentially deadly painkiller drugs like Demerol are openly injected into people by doctors.

Farrah Fawcett’s death was far less sudden than Jackson’s, but no less innocent. She was killed by chemotherapy — a toxic cocktail of chemicals pushed onto patients by oncologists who deceptively call it “treatment.”

Against the advice of many in the natural health community, Fawcett gave in to her doctors and agreed to be poisoned as a treatment for anal cancer. But what she didn’t know is that one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy is more cancer! And after subjecting her body to more chemotherapy, it wasn’t long before Fawcett was diagnosed with liver cancer. (Chemotherapy causes terrible harm to the liver, heart, kidneys and brain…)

Before long, her suppressed immune system and ongoing poison treatments overcame her body’s natural healing ability, and she died (as yet another victim of chemotherapy). Her doctors, of course, claim she “died of cancer.” Clever huh?

Cancer doctors operate with that sort of clever deception: If the cancer goes away, they claim the patient was “treated by the medicine,” but if the patient dies, they claim “the cancer killed them.” It’s pretty easy to claim success if you take credit for the wins while fleeing the any responsibility for the losses.

Back to Farrah, while many of her friends and supporters say her battle with cancer was “an inspiration,” let me be the first to publicly state that to me, poisoning yourself with toxic chemicals is NOT inspiring, no matter how much suffering you go through. I do not believe that people should be given special recognition for pain and suffering they consciously choose to inflict upon themselves, especially when all that suffering is easily avoidable. It would have been far more “inspiring” for Farrah to choose healing remedies instead of deadly poisons.

Had she chosen natural remedies, she could have skipped all the pain and suffering, restored her immune function, reversed her cancer and gone on to live a much longer and more abundant life. (It would have saved her a small fortune in medical costs, too…)

But she didn’t choose natural health (nutrition, vitamin D, immune support, superfoods and medicinal herbs). Instead, she chose poison. As a result, her decision to ravage her body’s health through “slash and burn” medicine ultimately cost more than her body could afford to pay.

Keeping the public in the dark

What’s especially sad about all this is that the conventional medical trade groups, the drug companies and the FDA are all conspiring to keep consumers ignorant of natural cancer remedies. So Farrah Fawcett almost certainly did not have easy access to the kind of information about natural remedies that could have saved her life. She would have had to read NaturalNews or other good sources of truthful information about natural solutions for cancer like Gerson Therapy (www.Gerson.org).

But this is all by design: Truthful information about natural remedies for cancer is intentionally oppressed by the medical establishment. Those who dare to offer health products with accurate descriptions about their anti-cancer attributes are threatened with arrest and imprisonment by the FDA and FTC. The very best doctors who can really cure cancer have been either thrown in prison or run out of the country (which is why all the best cancer clinics in the world aren’t located in the United States).

The medical industrial complex, in other words, has conspired to keep the American people uninformed and diseased, making them dependent on the for-profit medical system that dominates modern medicine. That Farrah Fawcett actually made a conscious decision to allow her body to be destroyed by chemotherapy is an indication of just how insidious and manipulative our conventional medical system really is.

Instead of giving patients options, it limits their options and gives them death. Instead of educating patients about how to prevent and reverse cancer, our medical system de-educates patients and seeks to isolate them from knowledge of natural remedies. Instead of empowering patients, it seeks to control and profit from patients. It is a failed system that kills celebrities just as mercilessly as it kills those who aren’t famous at all.

And unless we change our approach to healing cancer, more people will continue to die as victims of dangerous prescription drugs and failed chemotherapy “treatments.”

Because whether you’re famous or not, chemotherapy is still poison.

Buzz up

About the author: Mike Adams is a consumer health advocate with a mission to teach personal and planetary health to the public He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.

Read Full Post »

Milk is Good for You?

Posted in Healing the Sick, May 2009, tagged , , on May 28, 2009| 1 Comment »

I was browsing a local forum recently and came across a group of young people discussing what brand of fresh milk is the best, and cheapest. I can understand the need to watch one’s budget, especially when one is young and starting out on a career, but I think they missed a very important point – milk may not be necessarily good for them. I couldn’t resist penning a response to the topic, which I reproduce below:

“Medium to long term consumption of dairy (and this includes fresh milk) has now been proven to cause breast cancer in women and prostrate cancer in men.

The notion that we should drink milk for calcium so as to prevent brittle bones has since been debunked by a study undertaken by Harvard University. This is just but one article on it: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0820/is_n243/ai_19986663/

As to the reasons why we have been brainwashed to think that dairy is good for us, now that’s a long story. Do your research. All I will say here is that it involves the big farms, the big companies that produce these dairy products. In short, its about BIG profits.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with milk from cows, or goats, for the matter. Similarly, there is nothing much wrong to consume red meat now and then. It is not the animal’s fault. It is the way we do farming now, especially the way we feed these animals. Long ago, cows and goats ate GRASS. Now they eat a mixture of corn, soy and wheat – basically junk food for animals. What happens when these animals eat this junk food? Their bodies become imbalanced – they now have much, much more omega 6 in their bodies compared to omega 3. If they ate grass, God and nature had intended that there is a perfect balance of omega 3 and omega 6 intake (a balance close to 1/1). If they eat corn and soy, the resulting imbalance in our bodies (yes, after consuming their milk or meat) is as much as 1/15, even 1/40. If you want to know what this does to your body, go research. A clue – cancer.

I have not even mentioned about the pellets they feed to pigs and chicken and cows. Add all this up and you will get my drift.

So here we are, eating all this dairy, supposedly good for us and enjoying our steaks. What we are actually putting into our bodies are zero nutrients, bad omega 6 and best of all – chemicals (that the animals consume).

I do not mean to be a bringer of negative news. After all, its your own body and your health and that shouldn’t be my business. 

Just thought you should be informed. 

P.S. Forget about asking doctors about nutrition. Most of them know next to nothing about it. They DO NOT TEACH nutrition in medical schools, period. Want proof? Ask any relative or friend who has undergone major surgery, especially for cancer. When they ask their doctors what they can eat after the surgery, 99% of doctors will advise “Eat anything you want.” So go ahead and eat your bak kut teh, steaks, satay, char kway teow, barbecued delights, etc…..”

Read Full Post »

John Robbins Becomes Vegeterian

Posted in Healing the Sick, May 2009, tagged , , on May 27, 2009| Leave a Comment »

His dad invented Baskin-Robbins ice cream.

The house he grew up in had a pool
shaped like an ice cream cone.

He was offered the opportunity to take over his
father’s company and become worth hundreds of millions.

Instead, he went vegetarian. Why?


Read Full Post »

Choose Your Weapon

Posted in Healing the Sick, May 2009 on May 4, 2009| 2 Comments »

Review Of The Top Tier Cancer Fighting Products

Whenever you are killing cancer cells, you must support your detoxification system so that it does not become overwhelmed. There are several products important to take, especially at first, if you are weak. They will help reduce detoxification symptoms too.

Liver Balance Plus and Kidney Rescue are herbal formulas (tablets) that provide about 60% of the total support for both organs. High quality products. Their sister product, Seasonal Rescue, supplies the other 40% along with immune boosting and cancer fighting herbs. You may want to take quite a bit of these products at first and then stick with the Seasonal Rescue for continued use. UltraLiver8 uses the cancer fighting Reishi mushroom and other herbs not found in Liver Balance Plus to further repair and detoxify the liver while at the same time helping to fight cancer.

In addition, you will need to support the lymphatic system as it is responsible for getting rid of many cancer cells. Lymphatic Drainage is a formula that has been used by many doctors to support the lymph system and to get it flowing.

Zeolite acts as a powerful cancer cell killer… after it supports the detoxification system by grabbing hold of toxins. Because both the liquid and the powder would work in the body in slightly different ways, it does make sense to use both if affordable.

Cellular Zeolite. Four to eight bottles a month, supplying 15 drops three to five times a day is a therapeutic dosage for this liquid zeolite. 60 drops 4 times a day, which is about 24 bottles a month, is being used by some who wish to be super aggressive in their fight. Cellular Zeolite has little taste, can be put in food, fluids or even right on the tongue, with or without meals, so it is very easy to take. Drink plenty of water to eliminate any possible detoxification symptoms.

Cellular Zeolite is more concentrated than other types of liquid zeolites, absorbs more toxins, is better purified and safer to use as there is no danger of bacterial contamination. In addition, it is the most proven product for fighting cancer effectively.

(This is a very long article with numerous recommendations. To see the full list of ‘weapons’ read here.)

If you do have time on your side, chances are very high that employing these strategies will stop and even reverse your cancer because they correct the underlying conditions that allowed the cancer to develop in the first place. Plan on continuing a cancer fighting regime for at least a year. Even after the cancer is gone, you need to be supporting the body to help it recover so that the cancer doesn’t come back a year or two later.

These strategies won’t help you if you decide to do nothing. They are safe, natural supplements, they won’t hurt you in any way. They will only do good in your body. Use them in addition to what your doctor has you do, or use them on their own.

Read Full Post »

Another Way to Deal with Cancer…..

Posted in Healing the Sick, March 2009, tagged , , on March 24, 2009| Leave a Comment »

Use Zeolite (Natural Cellular Defense) To Kill Cancer Cells… 
Without Harming Your Body

Chemotherapy and radiation therapy tries to kill the cancerous cells. Unfortunately, they often harm your body in the process. There are natural supplements that do a good job of killing cancerous cells, but don’t cause harm to your body. A few supplements do have potential to be toxic to the body, and should probably just be used with the guidance of a naturopath or alternative doctor. These include cesium, artemisia, and B17. In this report you will learn about a completely safe cancer supplement that can be used with no supervision.

You may well ask why , if a safe and natural product is able to kill cancer, doesn’t your doctor recommend it. Of course, he probably doesn’t know about it, but even if he did, he’s not likely to use it.

It’s the nature of the medical/drug industry. Doctors use and recommend drugs that are approved in a process that costs hundreds of millions of dollars. The drug companies only make drugs that can be patented. That way they can sell them for huge mark-ups and have no competition.

So no company would ever take an unpatentable natural product through the drug process, so the healthy natural supplements aren’t approved as drugs. As they are not proven, doctors, or at least most doctors, won’t use them, and most don’t even know about them.

But if your doctor was not tied in and blinded by the medical/drug industry, he might see that a comprehensive approach using powerful supplements that deal with the many different issues in cancer, makes sense, and if he were to try this approach, might find it much more successful than only using drugs and other treatments that harm the body as they try to kill cancerous cells. But for now you have to turn to other resources to find safe cancer killers.

A mineral may turn out to be one of the most powerful cancer cell killers. Zeolite a remarkable volcanic mineral that has proven to be highly effective at destroying cancer cells. In fact, results have been so impressive, anyone fighting cancer or wishing to prevent cancer should be using zeolite. It comes in two forms….

A liquid zeolite, and a powdered micronized zeolite. They work on a couple of the basic issues in cancer. They are powerful detoxifiers and improve the alkalinity of your body. We list them as a cancer killer because of their ability to activate the P21 gene which tells a cancer cell to die, and because they can literally destroy the nucleus of cancerous cells.

In a 14 month study a liquid Cellular Zeolite proved itself to be a remarkable cancer fighter.

65 people with mostly stage 4 cancer, who had a prognosis of about 2 months to live, were given this type of liquid zeolite. At the end of the study, 51 people were cancer free and six more were alive, but still fighting cancer. This is a 78% cure rate for terminal cancer, an incredible 89% survival rate.

This study was actually similar to what happens in the real world. There was no control as to what drugs people were taking, or what other protocols they were on. Every person in the study basically answered an ad in a newspaper that said, “If your doctor has given up on you, come to us.” So there were mostly people who had completely end-stage cancer, whose doctors had sent them home to get their affairs in order.

Out of 65 patients, eight died during the 14-month study, 51 are clinically in remission, and the six remaining patients at the end of 14 months were undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, or some other treatment along with continuing to use the zeolite. Throughout the study, many patients used some sort of adjunctive treatment. For example, a lung cancer patient was told to go home and get his affairs in order. After three months on Cellular Zeolite, he was feeling much better. He went back to his oncologist, who suggested that he was strong enough to undergo more chemotherapy and radiation. So he stayed on the Cellular Zeolite, but he also went on chemo and radiation at that point.

Not bad for a bunch of folks sent home to die.

Footnote:

There’s a lot of excitement (some say it’s just hype) over Natural Cellular Defense (NCD) right now, especially online. Critics, however, point out that NCD is not safety approved by the FDA for any specific disease. Then again, neither is zinc, pomegranates or green tea, and we all know those are proven disease fighters. Besides, FDA safety approval doesn’t mean much to anybody who knows how the FDA really operates, since the agency routinely approves deadly drugs like Vioxx that have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans already (and continue to do so each year). Recently, too, an FDA safety panel gave near-unanimous approval to a diabetes drug that doubled the risk of heart attacks and strokes — another Vioxx disaster just waiting to happen. But that’s a different article.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

Food Matters!

Posted in Healing the Sick, March 2009, tagged , on March 10, 2009| 3 Comments »

Watch video here.

That is the message from the founding father of modern medicine echoed in the controversial new documentary film Food Matters from Producer-Directors James Colquhoun and Laurentine ten Bosch.

With nutritionally-depleted foods, chemical additives and our tendency to rely upon pharmaceutical drugs to treat what’s wrong with our malnourished bodies, it’s no wonder that modern society is getting sicker. Food Matters sets about uncovering the trillion dollar worldwide ‘sickness industry’ and gives people some scientifically verifiable solutions for curing disease naturally.

In what promises to be the most contentious idea put forward, the filmmakers have interviewed several world leaders in nutrition and natural healing who claim that not only are we harming our bodies with improper nutrition, but that the right kind of foods, supplements and detoxification can be used to treat chronic illnesses as fatal as terminally diagnosed cancer.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »