Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Chemo has a 97% fatality rate

The sad fact is that chemo is not only legal, but it is readily accepted by most oncologists as one of the best treatments for cancer. At least that’s what the typical oncologist tells the cancer patient….

…but in 1986, McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, one of the largest and most esteemed cancer treatment centers in the world, surveyed 64 oncologists to see how they would personally respond to a diagnosis of cancer.  The results will blow your mind. Are you sitting down? Of the 64 oncologists surveyed, 58 said that…

ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members due to the fact that the drugs don’t work and are toxic!

That  means that 91% of the oncologists surveyed would not submit themselves to the same protocols that they prescribe to their patients!  Is it just me, or does this seem hypocritical to you? I believe that this is not only hypocritical, but it borders on being criminal! They know that chemo will kill more patients than it will help, but they continue to tell their patients that it is their “best treatment option.” What a damnable lie!

Also read THIS.

A new study presented on December 1 at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) verified that annual mammography screenings may be responsible for causing breast cancer in women who are predisposed to the disease. Epidemiologist Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide from the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands suggests that doctors should be very cautious when screening younger women, especially those under age 30.

There are many conflicting reports about the benefits of mammography screenings, particularly among younger women below the age of 40. Because there is a high risk among women with genetic or familial predispositions to breast cancer when getting mammograms, Dr. Jansen-van der Weide and her research team are suggesting that these women get an alternative screening. Ultrasounds, MRIs, and heat thermography screenings are some alternatives that do not expose patients to radiation.

The study evaluated women in the high-risk group and determined that low-dose mammography radiation increased these women’s risk of developing breast cancer by 150 percent. Women under 20 who have had at least five mammograms are 2.5 times more likely to develop breast cancer than high-risk women who have never undergone low-dose mammography screenings.

Study authors emphasized the fact that doctors should be cautious in administering mammograms to younger women, especially those with a family history of breast cancer. Moderate- to low-risk women were not evaluated in the study. Alternative screening methods were encouraged in order to reduce the risk of women in high-risk groups from being harmed by radioactive exposure.

Comments

What this study really reveals is that there is no reason for any women to ever receive a mammogram ever again. Ultrasound and thermography should now be the new standard for breast cancer detection screenings, as they do not subject women to excess radiation.

This study also reveals that mammograms are really “repeat business machines” for the cancer industry. When enough women are subjected to mammography, a windfall of future cancer patients is absolutely assured, and this translates into billions of dollars in profits for the businesses invested in cancer: Big Pharma, mammogram machine manufacturers, and so on.

In fact, mammograms represent the slickest marketing gimmick we’ve ever seen in modern medicine. It’s a technology that recruits new patients by actually causing the disease is claims to “detect.” No wonder all the cancer industry non-profit groups donate so much money to breast cancer screening — it’s the best way to keep their sponsors in business!

Just take a look at the Susan Komen for the Cure non-profit, and you’ll see that a huge percentage of all the money they raise for “finding a cure” is really redirected to funding “free breast cancer screenings” that target poor women. The purpose of this whole scheme is to herd more women into extremely profitable (and extremely dangerous) cancer treatment cancers that generate billions for the cancer industry.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea…

I am reproducing my reply to an email sent by a friend (name/details removed) who is organizing a mid-spring walk + BBQ over in Melbourne, something that happens quite often over there. My friend has recovered from cancer and is enjoying life over there in Australia!
Hi (removed),

 

 

Actually, I do not advocate becoming a true vegan, as quite a few vegetarians also get cancer. Besides diet, the other major causes of cancer would be stress and inflammation-related causes.

 

I think one has to be balanced, and yes, when we are of that ‘golden’ age, we must enjoy life too! So eating the occasional bah kut teh or char kway teow is fine.

There is however one caveat though. Once a person has cancer, even a small amount of bad food may awaken the cancer within. As you know, there is no such thing as getting rid of all the cancer in the body. The medical establishment only hopes for what they call a remission. The alternative cancer treatment establishment’s greatest wish is for the cancer to ‘sleep’ and remain asleep for many, many years. Either way, the cancer is still in the body.

So I guess what I am saying is that certain groups of people who ‘had’ cancer should be extremely careful with their food intake and stress levels.

In any case, who am I to give advice? It’s just that I have seen enough to know and still continue to see many real-life cancer patients whose only sin was to enjoy their steak or satay, unknowingly awaken their cancer from its sleep. And when cancer returns, as it inevitably does in many a case, it comes back with a vengeance.

Do take care, my friend.

Randolph

 


—–Original Message—–
From: (name and email removed)
To: (name and email removed)
Sent: Sat, Oct 10, 2009 9:11 am
Subject: MID-SPRING GET TOGETHER – WALK + BBQ

Hi! Randolph,
Thanks for your article.  I suppose it depends on how healthy one wants to be and the extent of care to take.  Yes! a couple of my friends have turned vegetarian.  And Yes! a number of friends and varsity mates my age have “departed”  -Bless Their Souls!
Over here in Aussieland – I can almost say 100% of households will have one or more BBQ sets at home.  A lot of them will also have a  Pizza Oven.  In my case – our family will have BBQ functions about 4-5 times a year — mainly over the summer months.  It is somewhat a tradition and also an easy way to party.
Buy an assortment of meats; marinade them overnight; BBQ them.  Have some salads;  fry some noodles and cook a pot of curry and some roti chanai.  Then it is all go – with drinks – wine, beers, soft drinks, water – to suit individual.
As for me — going to be 65 shortly;  I try to be careful but not extremely at either end.  Am not a vegetarian nor a huge meat consumer — somewhat in between.  I reckon, at my age – just take life as it comes along.  Not 100% fit nor without ailments as one would expect of a 20 year old, but not too bad overall considering my comments above regarding some of my late mates.
My bladder is much better after the course of BCG treatment + a couple of follow up cat scans;  biopsies etc.  However, my urologist is somewhat perplexed by some strange looking cells in my urine samples — he reckons it is not cancerous even though he is completely happy with the results of all the biopsies he has taken — kidney, bladder and prostate.  I did not tell him that I have been, in a way self treating – with various natural products + my exposing the bladder to the sun whenever I can.  So having said that “No Worries”.
Meanwhile – take care
Regards
(name removed)

A Damning Opinion

The following post appeared in a local forum recently. The writer tells of how a seemingly careless oncologist at a local hospital contributed to her father’s death. I reproduce the post in its original, unaltered form. I sympathize with this person’s loss and it just goes to show how blind faith in our doctors and oncologists may lead to undesirable consequences.

Randolph

“my dad just passed away last 2 months of lung cancer

when he found out, it was just 2nd stage…but later on spreaded to lymph nod
the whole battle lasted for 1 year plus

Been thru 2 radiotheraphy and 3 Chemo…but of no help at all
He did all these with the oncologist, Dr Christina (UMSC, now in Sunway)
Being my own opinion, i would say she’s an unethical oncologist.
She’s recommend expensive and not so useful chemo to my dad, and we believe in her all the while.
And if u look carefully in the bill, she charged consultation fee on days even when she did not turn up.

She even suggest my dad to have the Chemo straight after a radiotheraphy. Even the radiotheraphist himself said to my dad, the doctor must be crazy, it’s a must for the patient to rest for 2 weeks before he proceed with any other theraphy.

So then we realise and transfer to another hospital. The other oncologist look at the medical record and told us the approach she took was all the way wrong. And since she already use such high dosage on my dad and so many times….there’s no use of having any chemo anymore…

We were hoping to try other things like herbal remedy…but that time he was too weak and coughing blood continuously…
it’s just too late to try anything…

how could she turn a 2nd stage patient into a dead body
damn her!”

rate
good
bad

Cancer is evil, and sometimes one wishes for the sufferer to be taken quickly by his/her maker, to defeat cancer by dying, so as to be able to live again, in a world where there is peace and eternal happiness.

Rokiah is in such a place right now…

Randolph/Ridhwan


CroppedDSCF0069

20071202_JBNov07_0028
DSCF0051
DSCN0740

“Absence and death are the same – only that in death there is no suffering.”
—  Theodore Roosevelt

Beta-1,3-Glucan: Extraordinary Immune Support

By Michael LeVesque on March 19, 2009 10:11 AMNo CommentsNo TrackBacks

Information provided by Immudyne, Inc.,
P.O. Box 51507, Palo Alto, CA

A new nutritional product called beta-1,3-glucan is one of the most exciting things happening today in the field of nutritional supplements.

Obtained from purified yeast, beta-1,3-glucan has a long scientific history and a reference list including literally hundreds of papers. Research originated in the 1940’s when Pillemer and his colleagues described a crude yeast cell wall preparation, Zymosan. They reported that this material was able to stimulate nonspecific immunity1. It was unknown at that time which element of this composition, containing a relatively crude mixture of proteins, lipids and polysaccharides, actually activated the immune response.

The answer came later in the 60’s, when Dr. Nicholas DiLuzio at Tulane University experimented with beta-1,3-glucan2 . In the late 1980’s Dr. Joyce Czop, at Harvard University, described the mode of action of this material in stimulating the immune system: there is a specific receptor for beta-1,3-glucan on the surface of certain cells, called macrophages3 that when activated, stimulate a cascade of events turning the body into “an arsenal of defense”.

Macrophages play an essential and pivotal role in the initiation and maintenance of the immune response. From an evolutionary point of view, the macrophage is the oldest and most consistently preserved immunologically competent cell known. Not only humans and higher animals, but primitive invertebrates such as Hydra, which have no other immunological effector cells, have macrophages. In order to function immunologically, the macrophages must pass through a state of activation which involves certain morphological changes but also, most importantly, a whole sequence of metabolic changes which result in the production of series of so-called cytokines which act as internal regulators of the immune system. Activation can be initiated by a variety of different stimuli, such as endotoxin, bacteria, viruses or chemicals which can be too toxic or pathogenic to be useful. Beta-1,3-glucan is not only orally effective, completely non-toxic and safe, but is one of the most potent stimulators of the immune response.

Considerable attention has been recently given to Aloe Vera extract, which was found to carry one of the macrophage activating polysaccharides, mannan or polymannose. While mannan has some macrophage activating potential, it is very slight compared to that of glucan4. There are several different glucans with different levels of activity, the most active of which is beta-1,3-glucan from the cell wall of yeast. A three dimensional model of this molecule shows it to be a helix, and the research at Harvard has shown that there exist, on the macrophage cell membrane, receptors for a small number of residues, approximately seven5 . The fact that such a small number of glucose units can activate this receptor is very remarkable. What is more remarkable still, is that there should be a specific receptor for this sort of polysaccharide chain on the surface of the most ancient sugar cell in the immune cascade. There is now evidence to show that glucan is, from an evolutionary point of view, the most widely and most commonly observed macrophage activator in nature6. The same enhancing mechanisms have been found in all branches of the animal, bird, fish and plant kingdoms7,8.

Full article here.

  • The best beta glucan is found here. And here’s the evidence. More evidence. How does the immune supplement you are taking now compare with beta glucan? (Be patient while file loads)

Who should take Beta Glucan and how much?

Everyone wanting to strengthen their immune system should take beta glucan (beta-1,3d glucan).

Transfer Point Beta GlucanThe average healthy person should take 200 mg of every day.

If you travel frequently you should take 500 mg per day.

If you are healthy and having surgery or dental work you should temporarily take 500 mg per day a week or two before and after your surgery.

Cancer patients should take 500 mg per 50 lbs. of body weight per day until they are in remission.

(NaturalNews) That Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett both died in the last 48 hours is shocking news to many, but it’s not nearly as surprising as the fact that they were both killed by Big Pharma’s toxic drugs.

Michael Jackson, we now know, died from an injection of Demerol given by his doctor — a man who is now the subject of an LAPD manhunt. There is little question that the injection of Demerol — a potent pharmaceutical — caused Jackson’s death. Chalk it up to yet another tragic loss of a hugely inspiring artist who has become a victim of the pharmaceutical industry and overzealous medical doctors.

Demerol, by the way, is a highly-potent opioid drug that’s also highly addictive. And yet it’s being prescribed (and injected) by doctors with the full support of the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry and the conventional medical community. It is nothing less than amazing that mild drugs like marijuana remain outlawed while potentially deadly painkiller drugs like Demerol are openly injected into people by doctors.

Farrah Fawcett’s death was far less sudden than Jackson’s, but no less innocent. She was killed by chemotherapy — a toxic cocktail of chemicals pushed onto patients by oncologists who deceptively call it “treatment.”

Against the advice of many in the natural health community, Fawcett gave in to her doctors and agreed to be poisoned as a treatment for anal cancer. But what she didn’t know is that one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy is more cancer! And after subjecting her body to more chemotherapy, it wasn’t long before Fawcett was diagnosed with liver cancer. (Chemotherapy causes terrible harm to the liver, heart, kidneys and brain…)

Before long, her suppressed immune system and ongoing poison treatments overcame her body’s natural healing ability, and she died (as yet another victim of chemotherapy). Her doctors, of course, claim she “died of cancer.” Clever huh?

Cancer doctors operate with that sort of clever deception: If the cancer goes away, they claim the patient was “treated by the medicine,” but if the patient dies, they claim “the cancer killed them.” It’s pretty easy to claim success if you take credit for the wins while fleeing the any responsibility for the losses.

Back to Farrah, while many of her friends and supporters say her battle with cancer was “an inspiration,” let me be the first to publicly state that to me, poisoning yourself with toxic chemicals is NOT inspiring, no matter how much suffering you go through. I do not believe that people should be given special recognition for pain and suffering they consciously choose to inflict upon themselves, especially when all that suffering is easily avoidable. It would have been far more “inspiring” for Farrah to choose healing remedies instead of deadly poisons.

Had she chosen natural remedies, she could have skipped all the pain and suffering, restored her immune function, reversed her cancer and gone on to live a much longer and more abundant life. (It would have saved her a small fortune in medical costs, too…)

But she didn’t choose natural health (nutrition, vitamin D, immune support, superfoods and medicinal herbs). Instead, she chose poison. As a result, her decision to ravage her body’s health through “slash and burn” medicine ultimately cost more than her body could afford to pay.

Keeping the public in the dark

What’s especially sad about all this is that the conventional medical trade groups, the drug companies and the FDA are all conspiring to keep consumers ignorant of natural cancer remedies. So Farrah Fawcett almost certainly did not have easy access to the kind of information about natural remedies that could have saved her life. She would have had to read NaturalNews or other good sources of truthful information about natural solutions for cancer like Gerson Therapy (www.Gerson.org).

But this is all by design: Truthful information about natural remedies for cancer is intentionally oppressed by the medical establishment. Those who dare to offer health products with accurate descriptions about their anti-cancer attributes are threatened with arrest and imprisonment by the FDA and FTC. The very best doctors who can really cure cancer have been either thrown in prison or run out of the country (which is why all the best cancer clinics in the world aren’t located in the United States).

The medical industrial complex, in other words, has conspired to keep the American people uninformed and diseased, making them dependent on the for-profit medical system that dominates modern medicine. That Farrah Fawcett actually made a conscious decision to allow her body to be destroyed by chemotherapy is an indication of just how insidious and manipulative our conventional medical system really is.

Instead of giving patients options, it limits their options and gives them death. Instead of educating patients about how to prevent and reverse cancer, our medical system de-educates patients and seeks to isolate them from knowledge of natural remedies. Instead of empowering patients, it seeks to control and profit from patients. It is a failed system that kills celebrities just as mercilessly as it kills those who aren’t famous at all.

And unless we change our approach to healing cancer, more people will continue to die as victims of dangerous prescription drugs and failed chemotherapy “treatments.”

Because whether you’re famous or not, chemotherapy is still poison.

Buzz up

About the author: Mike Adams is a consumer health advocate with a mission to teach personal and planetary health to the public He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.

 

IN  LIFE, WHAT  SOMETIMES  APPEARS  TO  BE THE  END 
IS  REALLY A  NEW BEGINNING.

“Funeral” is a new TV commerical launched by the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) which looks at relationships in a different light, through a woman at her husband’s funeral. Ultimately, the TVC celebrates the beautiful imperfections that make a relationship perfect. This is fresh off MCYS latest Viewers’ Choice 2008 win for last year’s Family TVC which promotes the importance and value of family bonding. 
  
This is the Singapore Funeral commercial from Ministry of Community Development.

 

I was browsing a local forum recently and came across a group of young people discussing what brand of fresh milk is the best, and cheapest. I can understand the need to watch one’s budget, especially when one is young and starting out on a career, but I think they missed a very important point – milk may not be necessarily good for them. I couldn’t resist penning a response to the topic, which I reproduce below:

“Medium to long term consumption of dairy (and this includes fresh milk) has now been proven to cause breast cancer in women and prostrate cancer in men.

The notion that we should drink milk for calcium so as to prevent brittle bones has since been debunked by a study undertaken by Harvard University. This is just but one article on it: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0820/is_n243/ai_19986663/

As to the reasons why we have been brainwashed to think that dairy is good for us, now that’s a long story. Do your research. All I will say here is that it involves the big farms, the big companies that produce these dairy products. In short, its about BIG profits.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with milk from cows, or goats, for the matter. Similarly, there is nothing much wrong to consume red meat now and then. It is not the animal’s fault. It is the way we do farming now, especially the way we feed these animals. Long ago, cows and goats ate GRASS. Now they eat a mixture of corn, soy and wheat – basically junk food for animals. What happens when these animals eat this junk food? Their bodies become imbalanced – they now have much, much more omega 6 in their bodies compared to omega 3. If they ate grass, God and nature had intended that there is a perfect balance of omega 3 and omega 6 intake (a balance close to 1/1). If they eat corn and soy, the resulting imbalance in our bodies (yes, after consuming their milk or meat) is as much as 1/15, even 1/40. If you want to know what this does to your body, go research. A clue – cancer.

I have not even mentioned about the pellets they feed to pigs and chicken and cows. Add all this up and you will get my drift.

So here we are, eating all this dairy, supposedly good for us and enjoying our steaks. What we are actually putting into our bodies are zero nutrients, bad omega 6 and best of all – chemicals (that the animals consume).

I do not mean to be a bringer of negative news. After all, its your own body and your health and that shouldn’t be my business. 

Just thought you should be informed. 

P.S. Forget about asking doctors about nutrition. Most of them know next to nothing about it. They DO NOT TEACH nutrition in medical schools, period. Want proof? Ask any relative or friend who has undergone major surgery, especially for cancer. When they ask their doctors what they can eat after the surgery, 99% of doctors will advise “Eat anything you want.” So go ahead and eat your bak kut teh, steaks, satay, char kway teow, barbecued delights, etc…..”

His dad invented Baskin-Robbins ice cream.

The house he grew up in had a pool
shaped like an ice cream cone.

He was offered the opportunity to take over his
father’s company and become worth hundreds of millions.

Instead, he went vegetarian. Why?